![]() ![]() Its main purpose is to create documentation from source code of different languages like TypeScript, C, Python, Visual Basic, Java, and F along with raw Markdown files. I find it easier and quicker to browse through the code in Visual Studio than to use the HTML docs. I’ve read that Doxygen allowing rich text via Markdown rather than reST makes it less powerful than Sphinx, and that there seems to be ways of inserting reST in Doxygen comments and produce Sphinx documentation via Doxygen XML output -> some tools (Breathe?) -> Sphinx. Doxygen Alternatives 1 DocFX Free 0 DocFX is an open-source, scalable, and extensible documentation generation with a variety of functionalities. Im finding it difficult to navigate the HTML pages produced by doxygen. Then substitute it for the Search and rename it predictive Search. The platform uses all the modern tools in modern web development to build a static website. Build documentation websites, blogs, marketing pages, and more. Middleman is a platform that enables users to build static websites with the help of an easy-to-use framework. Could somebody be more specific, and describe the issues with Doxygen’s handling of Fortran? Perhaps you could create a really nice index. Docusaurus helps you to move fast and write content. What are the alternatives for documenting Fortran code in a robust, sustainable way? I am particularly interested in generating documentation that is mathematically rich, and that would benefit from diagrams and links to research articles.įORD’s documentation states that it was written “due to Doxygen’s poor handling of Fortran”.This lack of maintenance discourages its adoption. As far as I can see, only lists one documentation tool, FORD ( ), which using the words of his creator is “in a pretty deep coma” (FORD issue #317): despite 67 open issues and 17 pull requests, the last commit is dated 15 months ago. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |